ABSTRACT
The research question central to the thesis is stated as follows: what are the implications of new technological
phenomena in South African law to the existing legal frameworks in relation to (i) investigatory powers of law
enforcement and security and intelligence agencies to obtain electronic evidence, and (ii) its subsequent
admissibility in criminal proceedings? Written with an emphasis on South African law, but also taking into
account aspects of foreign and international law, the thesis seeks to investigate how our existing legal frameworks
which regulate the use of and access to electronic evidence in criminal proceedings, including its admissibility,
integrate and adapt to challenges raised by new and rapidly changing technological developments.
The thesis provides a critical analysis of the existing legal framework regulating certain key investigative powers
of law enforcement and security and intelligence agencies in the current modern environment of the information
age in which they operate. Key among them is the Regulation of Interception of Communications and Provision
of Communication-Related Information Act 70 of 2002. New technology has not only increased opportunities for
criminal activity, it has also created opportunities for law enforcement and security and intelligence agencies to
have access to more sophisticated and new capabilities. The range of intrusive capabilities now available to law
enforcement and security and intelligence agencies triggers a range of issues and challenges for individual rights,
including how those capabilities are used in investigation activities, the scale of their use, the extent to which such
capabilities intrude on privacy rights, legislative authority for their use and safeguards that constrain and regulate
such new technological capabilities. The challenges of regulating investigative powers in an era of new and fastpaced
technological developments is explored in relation to (i) interception of communications (ii) acquisition
and retention of communications data, and (iii) access to encrypted information.
The introduction of electronic evidence in criminal legal proceedings raises unique challenges in the South African
law on evidence. The most interesting perhaps is the extent to which the nature of the evidence presented, in this
instance electronic evidence, impacts on admissibility in criminal proceedings. Potential anomalies arise as the
relevant legislation, the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 25 of 2002, is based on an electronic
commerce model law concerned with commercial activities. In this regard, two separate issues are the focus of
research interest. The thesis offers a rethinking of (a) admissibility of electronic evidence and (b) its weight. The
meaning and application of certain statutory provisions, insofar as it applies to electronic evidence as hearsay or
real evidence, or both, are key and controversial issues. Another relates to the business records exceptions, which
directly translated for electronic records appears to have created a problematic presumption. On matters of
evidential weight, there is no ‘one-size-fits-all’ approach that will work. While a robust consideration of
authentication is required in the court’s assessment of evidential weight of electronic evidence, it should not be
subject to inflexible tests that make it difficult for authentic electronic evidence to be admitted into evidence.
A central premise of the thesis is that evolving technological phenomena can and do present challenges to existing
legal concepts on evidence and the investigatory powers of law enforcement and the security and intelligence
agencies to obtain electronic evidence and for its admissibility in criminal proceedings. This is done in the context
of understanding whether South African law has developed appropriately in response to advancements in
technology. In the final analysis, the thesis considers appropriate and meaningful reform towards a modern and
transparent legal framework in South African law.
Singh, N (2021). Electronic Evidence In Criminal Proceedings. Afribary. Retrieved from https://tracking.afribary.com/works/electronic-evidence-in-criminal-proceedings
Singh, Nerisha "Electronic Evidence In Criminal Proceedings" Afribary. Afribary, 15 May. 2021, https://tracking.afribary.com/works/electronic-evidence-in-criminal-proceedings. Accessed 24 Nov. 2024.
Singh, Nerisha . "Electronic Evidence In Criminal Proceedings". Afribary, Afribary, 15 May. 2021. Web. 24 Nov. 2024. < https://tracking.afribary.com/works/electronic-evidence-in-criminal-proceedings >.
Singh, Nerisha . "Electronic Evidence In Criminal Proceedings" Afribary (2021). Accessed November 24, 2024. https://tracking.afribary.com/works/electronic-evidence-in-criminal-proceedings