Evaluation Of Doses Delivered During Ct Examinations By Different Scanners For Purposes Of Intercomparison And Dose Optimization.

ABSTRACT This research study was aimed at performing dosimetry intercomparison on different CT scanners in the diagnostic radiology departments of Korle-Bu Teaching Hospital (KBTH), Sweden Ghana Medical Center (SGMC) and Global Medical and Imaging Center (GMIC).Using the standard body phantom and integrated ion chamber technique volume computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) and Dose-Length Product (DLPs) within the phantom were evaluated. The ion chamber technique was applied to two 16 slice Siemens and one Toshiba Aquilion one CT scanners. CTDIvol and DLP values for the standard body polymethyl methacrylate ( PMMA) phantom were estimated and comparison made with corresponding console displayed values for accuracy and also to deduce a suitable method for optimization of patients and occupationally exposed worker doses. Effective doses were also calculated. An intra and inter institutional comparison of measured doses and console displayed doses were performed. Chest protocol at Automatic Exposure Control ( AEC) was applied during the scanning of the phantom. Estimated CTDIvol values (mGy) were 17mGy, 24mGy and 13.1mGy for SGMC, GMIC and KBTH respectively. These values deviated from the console displayed values by 24.1%, 22.9% and31.3% respectively. Similarly, estimated DLP values (mGy.cm) were 675mGy.cm,944mGy.cm and 419mGy.cm for SGMC, GMIC and KBTH respectively deviating from the console displayed values by 24.1%, 24.2% and 29% respectively. In terms of effective doses (E), the calculated E (mSv) values were 9.45mSv, 13.2mSv and 5.87mSv estimated from the DLPs from SGMC, GMIC and KBTH respectively using K ,the anatomy-specific dose coefficient expressing effective dose normalized to DLP in a standard CT dosimetry phantom of 0.014 mSv mGy-1 cm-1.The estimated doses were compared to other selected international Dose Reference Levels ( DRLs) and were within range

Overall Rating

0

5 Star
(0)
4 Star
(0)
3 Star
(0)
2 Star
(0)
1 Star
(0)
APA

ADAM, B (2021). Evaluation Of Doses Delivered During Ct Examinations By Different Scanners For Purposes Of Intercomparison And Dose Optimization.. Afribary. Retrieved from https://tracking.afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-doses-delivered-during-ct-examinations-by-different-scanners-for-purposes-of-intercomparison-and-dose-optimization

MLA 8th

ADAM, BASHIRU "Evaluation Of Doses Delivered During Ct Examinations By Different Scanners For Purposes Of Intercomparison And Dose Optimization." Afribary. Afribary, 13 Apr. 2021, https://tracking.afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-doses-delivered-during-ct-examinations-by-different-scanners-for-purposes-of-intercomparison-and-dose-optimization. Accessed 29 Nov. 2024.

MLA7

ADAM, BASHIRU . "Evaluation Of Doses Delivered During Ct Examinations By Different Scanners For Purposes Of Intercomparison And Dose Optimization.". Afribary, Afribary, 13 Apr. 2021. Web. 29 Nov. 2024. < https://tracking.afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-doses-delivered-during-ct-examinations-by-different-scanners-for-purposes-of-intercomparison-and-dose-optimization >.

Chicago

ADAM, BASHIRU . "Evaluation Of Doses Delivered During Ct Examinations By Different Scanners For Purposes Of Intercomparison And Dose Optimization." Afribary (2021). Accessed November 29, 2024. https://tracking.afribary.com/works/evaluation-of-doses-delivered-during-ct-examinations-by-different-scanners-for-purposes-of-intercomparison-and-dose-optimization