Search result: Two clinical studies were found
Clinical outcomes: The results indicate a higher fluoride concentration in plaque surrounding teeth that were either bonded or restored with resin-modified GIC than with compomer.
State of evidence and recommendations: The quality of the existing evidence requires further assessment.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Fluoride release of resin-modified GIC versus Compomers [October 27, 2014]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://tracking.afribary.com/works/fluoride-release-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-october-27-2014
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Fluoride release of resin-modified GIC versus Compomers [October 27, 2014]" Afribary. Afribary, 26 May. 2019, https://tracking.afribary.com/works/fluoride-release-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-october-27-2014. Accessed 07 Nov. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Fluoride release of resin-modified GIC versus Compomers [October 27, 2014]". Afribary, Afribary, 26 May. 2019. Web. 07 Nov. 2024. < https://tracking.afribary.com/works/fluoride-release-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-october-27-2014 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Fluoride release of resin-modified GIC versus Compomers [October 27, 2014]" Afribary (2019). Accessed November 07, 2024. https://tracking.afribary.com/works/fluoride-release-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-october-27-2014