Search result: There is a lack of clinical studies to this topic: Only three clinical trials were found and traced.
Clinical outcomes: The results are conflicting or suggest no difference between conventional GIC and Compomers in regard to their anticariogenic effects. State of evidence and recommendations: The quality of the existing evidence requires further assessment.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Have conventional glassionomer cements (GIC) a higher cariostatic effect than compomers? [October 14, 2014]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://tracking.afribary.com/works/have-conventional-glassionomer-cements-gic-a-higher-cariostatic-effect-than-compomers-october-14-2014
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Have conventional glassionomer cements (GIC) a higher cariostatic effect than compomers? [October 14, 2014]" Afribary. Afribary, 26 May. 2019, https://tracking.afribary.com/works/have-conventional-glassionomer-cements-gic-a-higher-cariostatic-effect-than-compomers-october-14-2014. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Have conventional glassionomer cements (GIC) a higher cariostatic effect than compomers? [October 14, 2014]". Afribary, Afribary, 26 May. 2019. Web. 12 Nov. 2024. < https://tracking.afribary.com/works/have-conventional-glassionomer-cements-gic-a-higher-cariostatic-effect-than-compomers-october-14-2014 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Have conventional glassionomer cements (GIC) a higher cariostatic effect than compomers? [October 14, 2014]" Afribary (2019). Accessed November 12, 2024. https://tracking.afribary.com/works/have-conventional-glassionomer-cements-gic-a-higher-cariostatic-effect-than-compomers-october-14-2014