Search result: Only three clinical studies were found.
Clinical outcomes: The results indicate no difference in the longevity between both types of materials.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Longevity of resin-modified GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 11, 2016]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://tracking.afribary.com/works/longevity-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-11-2016
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Longevity of resin-modified GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 11, 2016]" Afribary. Afribary, 27 May. 2019, https://tracking.afribary.com/works/longevity-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-11-2016. Accessed 12 Nov. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Longevity of resin-modified GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 11, 2016]". Afribary, Afribary, 27 May. 2019. Web. 12 Nov. 2024. < https://tracking.afribary.com/works/longevity-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-11-2016 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Longevity of resin-modified GIC versus compomers in primary teeth [October 11, 2016]" Afribary (2019). Accessed November 12, 2024. https://tracking.afribary.com/works/longevity-of-resin-modified-gic-versus-compomers-in-primary-teeth-october-11-2016