Search result: Only two clinical studies concerning restorations were found.
Clinical outcomes: The results indicate no difference in the survival rate after 12 and 24 months.
State of evidence and recommendations: The quality of the existing evidence requires further assessment.
[‘Preliminary Systematic Literature Searches’ are based on SYSTEM’s periodic systematic searches of the dental literature and provide first overviews over existing clinical evidence but are limited in the number of databases searched, as well as the assessment of precision and internal validity of results and thus do not replace the need for a full systematic review report to the topic]
Mickenautsch, S. (2019). Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 12, 2015]. Afribary. Retrieved from https://tracking.afribary.com/works/survival-rate-of-art-restorations-with-high-viscosity-gic-versus-conventional-rm-gic-october-12-2015
Mickenautsch, Steffen "Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 12, 2015]" Afribary. Afribary, 26 May. 2019, https://tracking.afribary.com/works/survival-rate-of-art-restorations-with-high-viscosity-gic-versus-conventional-rm-gic-october-12-2015. Accessed 18 Dec. 2024.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 12, 2015]". Afribary, Afribary, 26 May. 2019. Web. 18 Dec. 2024. < https://tracking.afribary.com/works/survival-rate-of-art-restorations-with-high-viscosity-gic-versus-conventional-rm-gic-october-12-2015 >.
Mickenautsch, Steffen . "Survival rate of ART restorations with high-viscosity GIC versus conventional RM-GIC [October 12, 2015]" Afribary (2019). Accessed December 18, 2024. https://tracking.afribary.com/works/survival-rate-of-art-restorations-with-high-viscosity-gic-versus-conventional-rm-gic-october-12-2015