ABSTRACT
Be, the unit under study, is realised as /bέ/, /bé/ or /bəʹ/ across the E3eme, T4`u and A`l4 dialects of the E3e language respectively. It has as an equivalent, “that” in the English language, s1 in Akan and ake in Ga. S1 and that have been studied widely as complementizers but be, according to Clements (1975), is a prepositional verb synonymous with the verb gbl4 (to say) in E3e. This study therefore sought to ascertain what kind of unit be actually is on the premise of Tagmemic Grammar. It was observed from analysing data collected from GES primary text books on E3e and 6 books from the E3e Bible that be is a pro-verb since it can replace some verbs in the language. It is also a complementizer like its English and Akan equivalents as it introduces lower clauses in complementation. As a unit whose grammatical class cannot be determined easily in some contexts, be is classified as a particle as well. It was also observed that be collocates mainly with verbs of request, advice, belief and motion as well as reporting verbs, factives, emotives and resultatives. Between the verb and be, there could be noun phrases functioning as objects and adposition phrases functioning as adverbials.
DATSA, C (2021). A SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF BE (THAT) IN E#E. Afribary. Retrieved from https://tracking.afribary.com/works/a-syntactic-analysis-of-be-that-in-e-e
DATSA, CYNTHIA "A SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF BE (THAT) IN E#E" Afribary. Afribary, 21 Mar. 2021, https://tracking.afribary.com/works/a-syntactic-analysis-of-be-that-in-e-e. Accessed 22 Nov. 2024.
DATSA, CYNTHIA . "A SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF BE (THAT) IN E#E". Afribary, Afribary, 21 Mar. 2021. Web. 22 Nov. 2024. < https://tracking.afribary.com/works/a-syntactic-analysis-of-be-that-in-e-e >.
DATSA, CYNTHIA . "A SYNTACTIC ANALYSIS OF BE (THAT) IN E#E" Afribary (2021). Accessed November 22, 2024. https://tracking.afribary.com/works/a-syntactic-analysis-of-be-that-in-e-e