Analysing The Chieftaincy Succession Dispute In Mandari And Its Socio-Economic Implications On The Development Of The Bole Traditional Area

ABSTRACT

In the wake of democracy and global enlightenment where the chieftaincy institution is expected to complement the modern form of governance to promote growth and development, it is rather seen as the main avenue to promoting instability and violence in some societies. The chieftaincy institution of Bole is one characterised by peace and smooth transitions. Except Mandariwura Kipo who was rejected by the elders of his gate, succession to Mandari has been peaceful, until the current dispute which started in March 2013. This study analysed the current dispute in the succession to the Mandari skin in the Bole traditional area and its accompanying socio-economic implications for the development of the area. It makes use of qualitative research techniques such as interviews and observation and quantitative method like questionnaire. The theoretical underpinning for this study is that of the relative deprivation theory whilst findings were analysed using the onion theory as basis. The findings indicate the following causes of the dispute: interference from the Yagbonwura, selfishness on the part of the elders of the Safope Gate and a large number of qualified princes in the various gates. The Socio-economic implications are weakening of the sense of family and unity, vacuum in traditional authority, disruption in agricultural (yam) production, drain on resources of District Assembly and undermining of the Yagbonwura‘s authority by the Bolewura. The following recommendations are made: the chieftaincy institution of the area should identify a conflict resolution framework that will satisfy both the sociopolitical and cultural dynamics of the people, and involve a team of independent arbitrators to discuss the issue with the family (Safope) and find the way forward.